I’m always giving my consulting clients assignments: Read this book. Listen to these interviews. Watch this movie. Could they be more accurately called “prescriptions”? The sessions in and of themselves are a bit therapeutic in nature, but the object of the therapy is just writing. Writing can be daunting, though, and I remember when it daunted me. A large part of why I might be taking in so much culture might be so that I can give good prescriptions, but it’s also simply because it’s what I like to pay attention to and I like to think along with other people who do the same.

Whether you complete the assignments is up to you, but from my own workshops and visits to classes and talks, I can tell that people are seeking cultural guidance and are desperate for a way into deep attention. 

There are no shortcuts here. Attention is a muscle, like any other, and I’ve been working on my own lately by going through my Criterion Collection list rather than easing into television in the late evenings. I’m reading more mentally strenuous or lengthy books by the chapter, morning by morning. I’m checking the news only in the morning and evening; print magazines are a scrolling substitute at the dog park. I’m listening to podcasts and the occasional audiobook while I walk Benny. I’m putting on WFUV on Fridays, to listen to the music someone else has chosen.

I’m making ritual of my attention and by doing so, I’m strengthening it. My attention was always ritual when I was younger, every new magazine or book or movie or album a holy object to be pored over until I knew the liner notes and jacket copy and casts and mastheads by heart. Every political crisis sucks people back into the corporate apps ever deeper, though, and there is reason for this: It’s a way to share information and resources, to get money to those who need it. 

But it’s also a drain, a way of removing us from the world, and it suggests to us that our attention, if placed elsewhere, is being misused. This is false and unhealthy, and it takes strength to reject. There’s a dance here, and we have to be conscious of it; if there’s one thing the corporate apps hate, it’s your consciousness and care and cravings for depth. As the writer P.E. Moskowitz recently asked in Mental Hellth: “Is your reliance on discourse a sign that you are intellectually under-stimulated?” Algorithmic corporate social media benefits from that under-stimulation by getting us hopped up on stressful or soothing input, depending on what it thinks will keep us using them longer.

The Food Essay 7 p.m. EST sessions begin in March. It will be five weeks of close reading, discussion, and considering how to approach different types of essays in our work. I’ve added Newsletter Workshop 2.0 and The Self-Edit Workshop sessions in February, and you can bundle them. One-on-one editorial consulting is available, as well.

When I think about attention as a ritual, I remember when I had a job I hated on Long Island right after college—one I’d drive to in my 2006 Scion xA, and occasionally I’d sit in my car before work listening to Democracy Now! on WBAI and cry about war, police brutality, and the general miserable conditions of the world. When Roberto Bolaño’s 2666 came out, I started to take the train a short distance so that I could have more time to read it, and doing this got me into town really early, and I’d go get a breakfast at the bagel shop and eat it relaxed and my brain would feel so much different, so much more expansive. It’s the high I’ve been seeking ever since, losing it and gaining it back over and over. It’s the high that taught me I hate cars. It’s the high that first let me know that in whichever pockets of time I could take control of my attention, I had to do so. 

Someone once asked me how I knew how to take care of myself so well, which was really a question about how I knew what to pay attention to, and I think the answer is the same when people ask me how I do research or what I read or why I write, and it’s in this instinct I had to take the train to work in the suburbs when I was 22 so that I could pay attention to a long book and eat an unhurried breakfast. Sometimes the meaning of your life is revealed just like that.

Life is, though, of course, a balance of crying at the state of things and enjoying our breakfast. In between, we figure out what to do. Ideally with a deep breath.

Here’s what I’ve been spending my attention on—the reading, watching, viewing, and listening that have kept my head above water:

logo

Want to know what’s up?

Members receive monthly links, watching and listening notes, and get access to an ongoing annual playlist to find new music (or remember the old).

Be My Guest

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

raechel jolie9 months ago

Thank you for excellent reading recs, as usual! Bookmarked several of them. Now that Peter is back I was finally able to start season 2 of The Pitt, and I am in 100% agreement. So middlebrow, so lib, so perfect lol. I wasn't as in love with Sentimental Value, but I totally understand why people have it in their top movies of the year. It didn't land as much for me, but I recognize that it was very good. (I looooved Worst Person in the World though.) I like the reviews of "If I had Legs" that are like "that was amazing I never want to see it or think about it again." that was sort of my response!!! & thanks for the Criterion recs, I am trying hard to let that be my go-to over Netflix in similar efforts to strengthen my attention. (I just watched Peter Hujar's Day and now I'm going to read Patrick Nathan's essay about it!) Anyway, ty, love your roundups!

Avatar

Alicia KennedyAuthor9 months ago

THANK YOU for this it means a lot, one worries they are rounding up into a void, lol, and yet I persist...! I am going to have a ton of Criterion recs next month, too, because I'm freaking IN IT!!! Downloading movies for the plane rather than watching Eat Pray Love again...! I need to read Patrick Nathan's review because I loved it and I've only seen people not love it.

Avatar

Monica E9 months ago

I've been slowly moving away from quantifying my reading. I left Goodreads a year two ago, but this year decided to keep track of my reading in a Moleskine book journal, rather than a spreadsheet, to fully remove myself from the numbers game. I'd never heard of 2666 (though now that I have it I can say it's familiar, that I've seen it before), and something about the way you described the train, and then the article you shared, well, when I was at a friend's this weekend she happily loaned me her copy even though I told her it could take me six months or so to read it, to which she shrugged her shoulders and said, "it's yours." I started it yesterday, and look forward to getting further into it as the weeks pass.

Avatar

Alicia KennedyAuthor9 months ago

This is such a nice message to receive and I hope you have a fruitful 2666 experience!

Avatar

Jen Clark9 months ago

Thank you for this!! I have been trying much harder to focus my attention on one thing at a time— watching movies and shows with my phone out of reach, writing without also having discord open to chat when I feel a lull. Your story about taking the train to have more time to read made me sort of miss my old job that didn't have wifi, back when data plans were very expensive, so my lunch breaks were always spent with a book spread out next to my containers of leftovers. These days, I could take the bus to work that gets me there just in time to start my shift, but I choose to take the one that gets me there half an hour early, because I enjoy the ritual of getting an espresso macchiato at the Italian deli and sitting there to read my book a little longer.

Avatar

Leigh Cypres9 months ago

"the U.S. deserves, a big gory smack in its face to remind it that expertise is real and science is borne by it." I love this line.

Avatar

Luis Rodriguez9 months ago(edited)

A large part of why I might be taking in so much culture might be so that I can give good prescriptions, but it’s also simply because it’s what I like to pay attention to and I like to think along with other people who do the same. love a sentence that lifts a veil over your understanding of the self--pleasure itself as the driver of where to spend your attention. (a big reason why i keep up with your work!)

on the other items:

  • i have been intimidated by 2666 whenever looking for my next read in my bookshelf, so this is a good push to get started.
  • i've also been on the Joachim Trier filmography trip (i'm hosting an Oslo trilogy watch party series!), and it was fascinating to see Reprise. having watched some of his later filmography, you can tell that Reprise is a debut feature film, but you can also tell the shared vision and spirit. i think he is able to capture contemporary urban life, its concerns and characters, in a way
  • Avatar

    Alicia KennedyAuthor9 months ago

    You gotta read 2666! It's a worthwhile journey. And I felt the same about Reprise, he's so clearly wearing his influences from French New Wave on his sleeve but it's also just so sincere! I love that about it, and about all of his work. There's a real empathy pulsing through his work that I really connect with.

    Avatar

    Cassandra Marsillo9 months ago

    Whenever I feel like I need to drag myself to the bus stop thinking “it would be so much easier if I had a car,” the thought of all the uninterrupted reading time I will get once I’m on public transit gets me moving!

    Avatar

    Alicia KennedyAuthor9 months ago

    Yes!!! The schlep has its payoffs!